Pablo
Neruda—although only mentioned briefly—plays a pivotal role in Changez’s life.
It is the moment that Changez explores Neruda’s house, while on a business trip
in Chile, that he realizes what his priorites truly are. Pablo Neruda was a
famous Chilean poet, and later an active politician in his country. Although
Neruda doesn’t seem influential at first, looking at The Reluctant Fundamentalist in terms of comparing Changez
and Neruda provides an extremely comprehensive and in depth analysis of the
novel, along with a better understanding of the reasoning behind Changez’s ultimate
decision to leave his American life and identity behind.
Neruda was born in
the early twentieth century in his native country of Chile. He is best known
for his love poetry, but he was also very involved in Chilean politics. As an
adult, Neruda was sent as a consulate to many countries. Just like Changez, he
traveled the world. After the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War, Neruda
returned home to Chile in order to become involved with the Republican
movement. Later in his career, he was even exiled for his Communist beliefs and
for protesting against the repressive policies of the then president, González Videla. After realizing his
anti-capitalism beliefs, Neruda returned home and fought for what he believed
in in his own country. It is for this reason that Hamid selected Neruda as such
a crucial character in the book. Even though his life in Chile may not have
been as luxurious as it was abroad, Neruda went home to his roots and his
“compact and beautiful” (Hamid 147) house to express his beliefs. Changez was able to relate to Neruda over their common
opposition to capitalism. Internalizing Neruda’s home and life caused him to
realize that he had nothing left to offer to America and that he was betraying
Pakistan by remaining in “enemy” territory (America).
Neruda is well known for his poems about love and nature, but many also
reflect his outspoken personality on many social and economic issues. After
reading his poem, “The Dictators,” I have a much greater understanding of
Neruda’s revolutionary spirit and how Changez was able to connect with them.
The poem reveals Neruda's dislike for the constant overthrow and installment of dictators in Chile. Neruda describes the feelings of the people with the line, "Hatred has grown scale on scale." Clearly, he is making a case against the "delicate dictators," and is expressing a need to eliminate the inconsistent government and the creation of more "graves full of rattled bones." Neruda describes the environment in which the dictators create as, “a mixture of blood and body, a
penetrating petal that brings nausea,” which clearly relays his hatred. Unlike Neruda, Changez does not feel hatred towards his own country. Instead, he is able to relate to Neruda's feelings in terms of America and her capitalistic principles. This
poem helps strengthen the connection that Changez made with Neruda when in his
house through revealing their common dislike for a certain government.
Pablo Neruda returned home to Chile in order to
spark a revolution regarding issues that he believed were right and important.
Changez also returned home to Pakistan in order to find himself. While
doing this, he discovers his scorn for America and everything she stands for.
This causes him to become an active participant in protests—similar to something
Neruda might have done. It is not my place to judge whether Neruda and Changez
did the right thing for themselves
and their countries—that is not the purpose of this paper. Rather, what should
be taken away is the immense importance of Neruda’s life in Changez’s
decisions. Knowledge of Neruda and his similarities to Changez makes it simpler
to decode how Changez was feeling and why he made the decision to return home and join the revolution occurring.
Sources:
Great post Nicole! I really liked your thesis and connection to Neruda's work. Your interpretation of the poem provided a different point-of-view for me, which I really enjoyed. Good job!
ReplyDeleteI think I have been thoroughly convinced by your blog post and the blog post we analysed in class that the time spent with Pablo Neruda is the pivotal point in the book. Your provide a convincing and compelling argument and you have actually used quotes which I have not seen too many of in the other blogs. Good job Nicole!
ReplyDeleteGreat blog post!! I like how you included the poem in your blog because it showed a great connection. I like how you used quotes because it would give examples for people looking at your blog that didnt read the book. Like Jens said you had a great argument and a good thesis.
ReplyDelete